[00:00:01]
GREETINGS, EVERYONE IT'S 6:00.
[CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL]
CALL TO ORDER THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING OF THE BEDFORD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR TODAY, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 7TH, 2023.WE'LL TAKE A ROLL CALL VOTE OF ATTENDANCE, PLEASE.
BRYAN HENDERSON. PRESENT. BRUCE EMERY CHAIRMAN.
WE'LL NOW HAVE THE INVOCATION AND COMMISSIONER OTTO WILL LEAD US IN THE PLEDGE.
THANK YOU FOR WATCHING OVER US.
THANK YOU FOR THIS SEASON THAT WE ALL ARE ENJOYING.
BUT MOST ESPECIALLY TODAY ON DECEMBER 7TH.
GUIDE US ALL AS WE MAKE GOOD DECISIONS TO BENEFIT THE ENTIRE CITY OF BEDFORD.
AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
ALL RIGHT. AS OUR FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS FOR P&Z.
[Additional Item]
PURSUANT TO SECTION 551.071 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO CONSULT IN A CLOSED MEETING WITH ITS ATTORNEY AND TO RECEIVE LEGAL ADVICE. REGARDING ANY ITEM LISTED ON THIS AGENDA.WE WILL TAKE A PAUSE IN OUR MEETING TO CONFER AN EXECUTIVE SESSION WITH OUR ATTORNEY.
ALL RIGHT. IT'S 6:20 WE'RE BACK FROM EXECUTIVE SESSION CONSULTATION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY.
[1. Continue a public hearing and consider making a recommendation to the City Council regarding a site plan application for Lot 2A1, Block 1 Bedford-Arlington Road LTD SUB and on Lot A1, Block 1 Dallas Federal Addition. The 2-acre site is located on the northwest corner of Airport Freeway and Central Drive and is commonly known as 1937 Airport Freeway and 1851 Central Drive. (PUD-23-7)]
OUR FIRST ITEM WAS TABLED FROM THE MEETING OF THE 16TH.CONTINUE A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL REGARDING A SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR LOT 2A1 BLOCK 1 BEDFORD ARLINGTON ROAD SUB ON LOT A1 BLOCK 1 DALLAS FEDERAL ADDITION.
AS AGAIN, JUST A REHASH HERE, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE MIXED USE CHARACTER ZONE OF BEDFORD COMMONS, AND THE USE OF PROPOSED DRIVE THROUGH RESTAURANTS IS ALLOWED.
THIS IS THE REVISED SITE PLAN THE APPLICANT PROVIDED TO US.
THE BIG CONCERN THAT WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE SITE PLAN LAST TIME WERE TWO.
AND THEN THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT A DRIVEWAY APPROACH ALONG AIRPORT FREEWAY.
THE APPLICANT MET WITH STAFF A COUPLE OF TIMES ON.
WE HAD SEVERAL CONFERENCE CALLS ON THIS ON THIS APPLICATION.
THE STRUGGLE HERE FOR THE APPLICANT AND FOR STAFF AS WELL, IS THAT THE PROPERTY IS NOT ONLY LOCATED IN THAT HIGHWAY MIXED USE CORE ZONE THAT ENCOURAGES, UM, AUTO DOMINATED USES TO BE KIND OF ORIENTED TOWARD THE FREEWAY, TOWARD THE FRONTAGE ROAD THERE.
SO WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AUTO DOMINANT USES AND, UM, TRYING TO ORIENT THEM TOWARD A DIFFERENT DIRECTION THAN THE DEVELOPMENT THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GEAR WALKABILITY TOWARD, IT MAKES IT A CHALLENGING SITE IN ORDER TO ACCOMPLISH ALL THAT.
THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED SOME CROSSWALKS AND MADE SURE WE LOOKED AT EXISTING SIDEWALKS TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING TIED TOGETHER. UM, SO THEY DID THEIR BEST THEY COULD.
[00:05:03]
WANT TO TO GO TOO FAR DOWN THAT PATH, BECAUSE ONCE YOU DO THAT, YOU HAVE TO GET TXDOT INVOLVED.AND TXDOT IS NOT ALWAYS THE FASTEST, MOST EFFICIENT ORGANIZATION TO WORK WITH.
AND I DIDN'T SAY THAT, BUT SO WE WERE TRYING TO AVOID TRYING TO WORK WITH TXDOT IN WIDENING THAT.
AND THAT DOES MEET THE ORDINANCE.
THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSING, UH, SINCE THESE ARE THREE AUTO DOMINATED USES, AND WE DO HAVE A LOT OF TRAFFIC THERE AT TEXAS HARLEY WAY AND IN CENTRAL, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO DO SOME OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS, A RAISED MEDIAN THERE SO THAT TRAFFIC CAN'T CUT ACROSS TEXAS HARLEY WAY INTO PLAZA OR THE CHICK FIL A DRIVE THROUGH.
AGAIN, I THINK EVERYBODY'S FAIRLY FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE.
WE STILL RECEIVED NO RESPONSES IN FAVOR OR AGAINST THE REQUEST.
AND WITH THAT, I CAN TAKE ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE.
I KNOW THE APPLICANT IS HERE AS WELL.
SO WES ONE CLARIFICATION ABOUT THE ACCESS OFF OF 121.
UH, CLARIFY FOR US MY UNDERSTANDING THAT YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GET TXDOT APPROVAL TO REMOVE A CURB CUT, BUT YOU DO HAVE TO GET ONE, AS YOU MENTIONED, TO EXPAND.
ANY WORK YOU DO IN TXDOT YOU'VE GOT TO GET THEIR PERMIT.
THAT CURB CUT 24 FOOT IS THE SMALLEST BETWEEN CENTRAL AND FOREST RIDGE.
THERE ARE SEVERAL CURB CUTS INTO THE VARIOUS PROPERTIES.
ALL OF THOSE ARE AT LEAST ONE AND A HALF TO TWO TIMES THE SIZE OF THIS ONE.
THAT'S WHAT BROUGHT ME ON THE COMMENT TO LOOK AT THAT, BECAUSE, I MEAN, YOU'VE GOT THREE ENTITIES THAT ARE GOING TO WANT TO ACCESS THIS ONE POINT. I SEE TWO PICKUPS GOING TO JUST, CLOG IT UP.
SURE. 24FT IS THE IS THE STANDARD WIDTH.
UM, AND AND THIS IS, THIS WAS BUILT PROBABLY BEFORE THE OTHERS THAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO.
UM, SO IT'S, IT'S AN EXISTING DRIVEWAY THAT WE JUST, WE KIND OF HAVE TO LIVE WITH.
SO THE DIFFERENCE IN THE PLAT BETWEEN LAST MEETING AND THIS MEETING, IN ESSENCE, IS THE WALKWAY.
IT'S BETWEEN THE AND THE APPLICANTS HERE.
THAT'S MY SEGUE TO THE DEVELOPER.
PERFECT. ANYTHING ELSE FOR STAFF? I HAVE A QUESTION.
UM, I CAN'T READ THESE TERRIBLY WELL.
WHERE IS THE OUTDOOR SEATING DESIGNATED ON EACH OF THESE? BECAUSE I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT IT'D BE NICE TO HAVE OUTDOOR SEATING, BUT GIVEN THAT IT'S RIGHT OFF THE FREEWAY, THAT'S A LITTLE CHALLENGING.
IT'S NOT A REQUIREMENT THAT EACH OF THEM HAVE OUTDOOR SEATING, BUT I KNOW A COUPLE THERE ARE.
THERE ARE SOME OUTDOOR SEATING PLANNED, I THINK, ALONG.
YES. OKAY. JUST AS A AS A REFRESHER AND A REMINDER IN THE PACKET, THERE'S THE ARTIST DRAWING, RIGHT, OF WHERE THAT IS WITHIN THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BUILDING, WHICH IS REFLECTED IN THE PLAT THERE ON LOT TWO.
IT'S THE THE LIGHT GRAY SQUARE.
THAT'S THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA, WHICH IS THE FOOTPRINT.
YOU SEE TWO DRIVE THROUGHS RIGHT THERE AND IT GOES TO THE NORTH TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK.
WES. DOES THE APPLICANT HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? GOOD AFTERNOON, CHAIR MEMBERS.
MY NAME IS JAKE FEARS CIVIL ENGINEER AT JFE ENGINEERING.
UM, YEAH, A COUPLE OF ITEMS. YOU KNOW, WE WENT EXTENSIVELY, DISCUSSED OPTIONS WITH PLANNING STAFF ON HOW TO MAKE THIS, THIS SITE MORE PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY.
[00:10:02]
AND AS WES HAD INDICATED, THERE WAS SEVERAL CONSTRAINTS BECAUSE OF THE MULTIPLE ZONING, UH, CONSTRAINTS, ESPECIALLY ON THE AIRPORT FREEWAY SIDE, THAT REALLY PREVENTED THE SITES FROM SHIFTING SOUTH TO OPEN UP MORE GREEN SPACE.BUT WE DID ADD PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM TEXAS HARLEY WAY TO LOT TWO, AS SHOWN IN THE MIDDLE THERE.
UM, EVERY SITE HAS POTENTIAL FOR OUTDOOR DINING.
LOT ONE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THAT BUILDING, THERE'S THERE'S AN OVERHANG.
YOU KIND OF SEE THE LITTLE SMALL BLACK BLOCKS.
THAT'S THE THE CANOPY COVER THERE.
THERE'S A POTENTIAL OUTDOOR DINING THERE.
LOT TWO HAS THE AREA THAT UH, UH COUNCIL [INAUDIBLE] DISCUSSED EARLIER AND THEN ALSO ON LOT THREE ON THE KIND OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT SITE AS WELL.
WE WILL CONTINUE TO NOW WE WILL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING THAT WAS TABLED.
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM? PLEASE COME FORWARD.
NOW IT'S 6:30, WE'LL CLOSE THE CONTINUATION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UH, BEFORE WE GO IN, GO AHEAD.
UH, GENTLEMEN, WOULD YOU PLEASE STAND UP FOR A MINUTE? THE DEVELOPER. AND SO, WHILE WE'RE IN OUR PUBLIC MEETING, UH, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.
UH. WE SHOULDN'T HAVE INCONVENIENCED YOU TO THIS DEGREE.
BUT THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR CONTINUED INTEREST IN THIS PROJECT.
THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I PROPOSE THAT WE, UH, APPROVE PUD-23-7.
I'LL SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR HAND. OKAY.
PASSES UNANIMOUSLY FOR PUD-23-7.
APPROVED. FORWARDED ON TO COUNCIL FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION.
[2. Consider approval of a preliminary plat of Kane Hall Barry Addition being Lots 1 & 2, Block B, 2.410 acres in the A. J. Woodson Survey Abstract No. 1641, located at the southwest corner of Harwood Road and Martin Drive within the city limits of Bedford, Texas. (PLAT-23-7)]
2.4 ACRES IN THE AJ WOODSON SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 1641.THE UM SOUTHWEST CORNER THERE.
CURRENTLY, UH, ONE UN PLATTED LOT AND IT IS BEING PROPOSED INTO TWO.
THE SITE ACCESS IS PROPOSED OFF OF, UH.
AND THEN LOT TWO IS AN UNDECIDED USE.
ACCESS IS PROPOSED OFF OF BOTH MARTIN AND HARWOOD PUBLIC SERVICES ARE EXISTING AND PLAT MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S ORDINANCES AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
THAT LOT HAS BEEN VACANT SINCE I'VE BEEN HERE SINCE 1980.
OTHER THAN THE COUPLE OF HORSES THAT HAVE BEEN ON THAT THING SO.
I'M GLAD TO SEE SOMETHING MOVING.
MIC] THIS IS OUR PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THIS.
THAT'S CORRECT. THIS IS DOES NOT REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING.
YOU GUYS HAVE QUESTIONS OF STAFF? COMMISSIONERS I MOVE WE APPROVE PLAT 23-7.
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GALLENSTEIN.
[00:15:02]
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HANDS.PASSES UNANIMOUSLY FOR PLAT 23-7.
[3. Conduct a public hearing and consider making a recommendation to City Council regarding a rezoning of the property described as Lot 2R01, Block 1 Bedford Centre from Heavy Commercial to Heavy Commercial/Specific Use Permit-Religious Facility and the property is generally located west of the Bedford Road and Tennis Drive intersection, commonly known as 209 Bedford Road. (SUP-23-19)]
BEDFORD CENTRE FROM HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC USE PERMIT RELIGIOUS FACILITY, AND THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BEDFORD ROAD AND TENNIS DRIVE AT 209 BEDFORD ROAD.STAFF REPORT. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. COMMISSION MEMBERS, I THINK MOST PEOPLE ARE FAMILIAR WITH THIS PROPERTY.
WE'VE SEEN A COUPLE OF SUPS ON THIS PROPERTY IN THE PAST.
IT IS A SHOPPING CENTER THAT WAS DEVELOPED BACK IN 1984.
THE SPECIFIC REQUEST FOR THIS IS TO UTILIZE A 2,000 SQUARE FOOT SUITE FOR A RELIGIOUS FACILITY.
OUR ORDINANCE REQUIRES THAT ALL RELIGIOUS FACILITIES RECEIVE A SPECIFIC SPECIFIC USE PERMIT.
UM, SITE IS AGAIN I THINK EVERYBODY'S FAMILIAR.
THIS SUITE IS LOCATED CLOSEST TO BEDFORD ROAD.
THERE YOU CAN SEE THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT.
AGAIN, NO EXTERIOR CHANGES TO THE SITE.
THE USES TO THE NORTH ARE MULTIFAMILY, TO THE EAST AND WEST ARE TO THE WEST IS A CAR WASH, TO THE EAST IS AN OFFICE BUILDING, AND THEN TO THE SOUTH IS MULTIFAMILY AS WELL.
WE NOTIFIED EIGHT PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN THE 200 FOOT RADIUS.
I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
WES IS THIS THE SAME BUILDING COMPLEX WHERE THAT GAMING CENTER WAS? YES, SIR. WAS GOING TO GO? YES, SIR. OKAY.
THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. DIFFERENT SUITE SAME CENTER.
IS TO BE ASSUMED THE OWNER OWNS THIS ENTIRE BUILDING.
THAT'S CORRECT. IT'S ALL UNDER ONE OWNERSHIP.
OKAY, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
WE'LL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING HERE ON CASE SUP-23-19.
ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THIS ITEM, PLEASE COME FORWARD.
STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD.
6:37 WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE SUP-23-19.
COMMISSIONERS. WES IF I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS, WILL THE COMMENTS ABOUT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WILL THEY TAG ALONG WITH THIS? YES THEY WILL. I JUST WANT TO BE SURE THAT.
NO, THAT'S THAT'S ALL JUST INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS THAT THEY PUT THROUGH THE DRC PROCESS.
UM, THOSE ARE ALL THINGS THAT WILL BE ADDRESSED DURING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY.
MR. CHAIRMAN, I WOULD MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT WE APPROVE THIS AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL REGARDING REZONING OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN LOT 2R01 BLOCK ONE, BEDFORD CENTRE FROM HEAVY COMMERCIAL TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC USE PERMIT RELIGIOUS FACILITY, AND THE PROPERTY IS GENERALLY LOCATED WEST OF BEDFORD ROAD AND TENNIS DRIVE INTERSECTION.
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 209 BEDFORD ROAD SUP-23-19.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND. COMMISSIONER JACOBSEN.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.
PASSES UNANIMOUSLY FOR SUP-23-19.
[4. Conduct a public hearing and consider making a recommendation to City Council regarding a rezoning of the property described as Lot D, Shady Oaks East Addition from Service Commercial to Service Commercial/Specific Use Permit-Religious Facility and the property is generally located at the northwestern intersection of Brown Trail and Taylor Drive, commonly known as 2701 Brown Trail. (SUP-23-23)]
SERVICE COMMERCIAL TO SERVICE COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC USE PERMIT RELIGIOUS FACILITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON BROWN TRAIL AND TAYLOR.[00:20:01]
KNOWN AS 2701 BROWN TRAIL.STAFF. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. COMMISSION MEMBERS, AS AS STATED, THIS PROPERTY IS OFF OF BROWN TRAIL, JUST SOUTH OF HARWOOD ROAD.
IT IS PREDOMINANTLY AN OFFICE BUILDING THAT HOUSES SEVERAL DIFFERENT TYPICAL OFFICE USES WITHIN IT.
THE REQUEST IS FOR A RELIGIOUS FACILITY TO BE LOCATED IN A PORTION OF IT, APPROXIMATELY 8,000FT².
UM OFFICE BUILDING WAS DEVELOPED IN 84 THE UM.
ACCORDING TO THE FLOOR PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT, UH 70 SEATS WOULD BE REQUIRED BASED ON THAT FLOOR PLAN AND CITES THE SURROUNDING USES OF THIS.
LET ME JUST. OH, HERE'S THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
AGAIN NO CHANGES TO THE EXTERIOR PROPOSED SURROUNDING USES TO THE NORTH AGAIN, IS HEAVY COMMERCIAL RETAIL SHOPPING CENTER. TO THE SOUTH IS ANOTHER RELIGIOUS FACILITY.
UM, TO THE EAST IS VARIOUS OFFICE RETAIL USES.
AND THEN TO THE WEST ARE IS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
23 PROPERTY OWNERS WERE NOTIFIED WITHIN THE 200 FOOT RADIUS.
AT THIS POINT, WE'VE RECEIVED NO REQUEST OR NO LETTERS OF OPPOSITION OR IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST.
AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.
I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.
CLARIFICATION. CLARIFICATION PURPOSES.
THIS IS THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE SINGLE STORY BUILDING NEXT TO THE MULTI STORY CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY.
THANK YOU. IT'S ALL ATTACHED BUT YES SIR.
I HAVE A QUESTION. UH, DO WE HAVE A ZONING FOR RELIGIOUS FACILITIES OR WERE THEY ALL SUPS ? THEY'RE ALL SUPS.
OKAY. AND THEN I GUESS SECONDARILY TO THAT, NOT THAT I'M JUST JUST FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
THERE'S NO TAX BENEFIT FOR RELIGIOUS FACILITIES TO THE CITY, RIGHT? NO, NOT THAT I'M NOT.
UNLESS I'M MISSING SOMETHING NO.
THE I WILL SAY, JUST TO EXPLAIN A LITTLE BIT MORE AS TO BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, THE WAY IT'S WRITTEN, THE REASON THEY REQUIRED SUPS WHEN THEY DRAFTED THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS THEY REALLY FOCUSED ON THOSE CHURCHES THAT WERE MAYBE THE MEGACHURCHES THAT WERE COMING IN AT A TIME, UM, AND GOING AGAINST RESIDENTIAL. SO IF YOU'LL NOTICE IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, THE ZONING ORDINANCE LAYS OUT SOME CONDITIONS FOR RELIGIOUS FACILITIES ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL. UM, BUT IN THE LAND USE CHART, IT JUST ACROSS THE BOARD REQUIRES AN SUP.
SO I THINK THAT'S WHY THEY PUT THE SUP REQUIREMENT ON THERE.
WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON CASE SUP-23-23.
[INAUDIBLE] I DID LOOK AT THE FACILITY THIS AFTERNOON, AND IT DOES APPEAR THIS IS JUST AS AS INFORMATION THAT THE PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF GOD ALSO HAS AN OUTREACH CENTER IN THE PRIMARY IN THAT OFFICE BUILDING.
DIDN'T KNOW THAT FROM THE MATERIAL.
BUT SO THEY HAVE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE AN OUTREACH CENTER IN THE BUILDING.
SO OBVIOUSLY THEY'RE PLANNING TO PUT THE CHURCH NEXT TO THE OUTREACH CENTER JUST AS INFORMATION.
I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE SUP-23-23.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.
PASSES UNANIMOUSLY CASE SUP-23-23 HAS BEEN APPROVED BY P&Z ON THE COUNCIL.
WES YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE FOR US?
[00:25:04]
[INAUDIBLE] MOTION TO CLOSE THE MEETING.IS THERE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? SECOND. THANK YOU. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.
MERRY CHRISTMAS COMMISSIONERS.
OKAY. THIS WILL BE OUR ONLY MEETING FOR DECEMBER.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.